Do you believe every word of the Bible!?
That’s the question. You’re entering deep water here, boys – beware of drowning in it!
interesting. thanks for posting this
Mark–How about the following for a response?
I disagree with the premise behind the question–that a candidate’s answer will tell you everything you need to know about him. Both the Pharisees and Jesus believed ‘every word’ of the Scriptures–yet their lives were entirely different. Jesus read the Bible as if it were all about him and the salvation he brought; the Pharisees read it as if it were a set of rules and means by which they maintained their own salvation. Its not only how true you take the Bible to be, but also how you read and interpret it, that shapes who you are. By the way, yes–I believe absolutely every word in the Bible, but I believe in and read it like Jesus did.
Tim Keller?!….any relation to Tim Keller?
Thanks Tim. Your point is spot on.
“Do you believe every word of the Bible” is such a loaded question that it’s impossible to answer clearly within the time constraints of a televised debate. I doubt whether Romney quite understood at that moment why he was fumbling: he would have needed about 10 minutes to define terms before he could even begin to answer coherently.
But here’s a related situation my son faced early this semester under the (adjective avoided) teaching of one Bart Ehrman, a rather famously atheistic professor and author at UNC Chapel Hill (author, “Misquoting Jesus: the Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why”). On the first day of class, Ehrman asks for a show of hands: “How many of you believe that the Bible is true?” About one third of the students raise their hands (bravo!). Next question: “How many of you have read the Bible, cover to cover?” Perhaps three or four students still have their hands up. And you can guess the next question: “Why would you say you believe something you haven’t even fully examined?”
I have been musing on this little story all semester. It rings disturbingly true about too many American believers (they certainly should have read the Bible). But it disturbs me also because I sniff some dubious (and perhaps dangerous) assumptions behind Ehrman’s question — assumptions which I am having a hard time articulating. Anyone care to help here?
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.
Subscribe to comments
Click below to go to
As Anselm of Canterbury so wisely described his outlook:
FIDES QUAERENS INTELLECTUM
which, being interpreted, means
Faith Seeking Understanding
I have faith, I always seek, I occasionally understand
All Q original content is © Mark Meynell (2006-2011)
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.