Skip to content

September 8, 2010


The papal visit and truths worth dying for

by quaesitor

The pope is arriving on these shores next week. And there are many things that make his visit controversial. There are of course even people who want to try to arrest him. I certainly don’t think that is the right way to proceed and bear him no ill-feeling necessarily. Nor does it particularly worry me that he’s visiting the country. Why shouldn’t he? And as they say, ‘some of my best friends are Catholic’.

But if one of the purposes of such visits is to raise the profile of Catholicism, then it is perfectly fair game to re-examine the reasons why many of us count ourselves Christian but not Catholic.

Some believers constantly relive past battles of spiritual ancestors as if little or nothing has changed for decades or even centuries; while others reject the need to get involved those such debates altogether (perhaps in the mistaken assumption that this makes them more contemporary). Neither path makes sense. The past is not irrelevant but nor is it a straightjacket. As I previously quoted on Q a few weeks back, Tom Wright helpfully sums it up like this:

the trick is to recover the first-century questions and try to give twenty-first century answers, rather than taking sixteenth-century questions and giving nineteenth-century answers…

Still, some past battles continue to have relevance when they concern first-century questions – and that is in large (though not entire) part what the Reformation was concerned with in its determination to get back to the sources (‘ad fontes‘) of Scripture and the early church. We might not answer the questions in exactly the same way that the likes of Luther or Calvin answered them (not least because the presenting issues are different) After all, 21st Century Catholicism is by no means identical to its 16th Century forebear. But we would be unwise to ignore what they said and why they said it, especially if there are aspects of Catholic belief that have not in fact changed that much.

This then was the thinking behind a recent, but all too brief, series preached by the boss, Hugh Palmer last month. It was a corker on the 4 ‘sola’s of the reformation, under the title TRUTHS WORTH DYING FOR. Definitely worth checking out:

4 Comments Post a comment
  1. Ian Paul
    Sep 8 2010

    I hope I might find time to listen to Hugh’s sermons at some point, and as an ex-RC myself appreciate the point. But in my experience a lot of evangelical theology flattens out what the whole of Scripture is saying.
    . Does ‘Grace Alone’ mean that I have an exclusively twice-born spirituality, and complete discontinuity with what went before?
    . Does ‘Faith Alone’ mean that intention is more important than actions?
    . Does ‘Bible Alone’ mean that interpretative traditions hold no value, or that there is no role for an interpretative community?
    . Does ‘Christ Alone’ mean that the fatherhood of God and the work of the Spirit are secondary?
    I am sure that in each case, the consequence need not follow on–but it is interesting to see how, in much evangelical spirituality, these things do in fact happen.

    • Sep 8 2010

      fair all too often, but not in this case fortunately

  2. Nov 3 2010

    I’m just a Yankee from across the ocean, but it seems to me that the simple truth is often the closest to being accurate. I want my deep facts to be digested and made simple so I can transmit them to every man, woman and child. The truth is often DEEP but the fish ain’t down deep or as Billy Graham used to say, ” I want to presch the Gospel of Jesus Christ so simply that even a PhD (of DPhil) can understand it.”


Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Latest Links | BLOG OF DAN

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

%d bloggers like this: